0xdc7b…39b6 · Hyperliquid address profile

0xdc7be236c4b1ee77d16758451a198275ec9839b6View on Hyperliquid ↗

Copyable nowPosition trader Mark-to-market cumulative profit $260K, ranked #1854 site-wide.

Three things to check before following him

This address still holds
$157K
perps + spot + vaults + staking; perps account $51K, 1 open positions
Ever liquidated
No
No liquidation on record in this window
Time since last trade
Traded today
last fill 2026-09-22

Those three numbers describe where he stands now. The curve below is a different thing — how much he made in the past. An address showing $260K of profit can be sitting on an empty account, and the P&L figure alone will never tell you.

Mark-to-market cumulative P&L

$260K$409K

Three definitions on one axis: green = our mark-to-market ledger · red = the exchange's public "closed P&L" · grey dashed = exchange all-in. The shaded gap is what closed-P&L misses ($-148K). The hatched band on the left is before our data starts (20250819); the exchange had him at $0 by then — that is why our number differs from other sites.

His account equity

Equity at start
$117K
2025-08-20
Equity now
$151K
2026-09-22
All-time high
$293K
now 52% of peak
P&L over the same span
$260K
from trading, deposits excluded

The green line above is how much he made trading (rebuilt from on-chain fills; deposits and withdrawals are invisible there). This amber line is how much money is in his account (from the exchange API, deposits included). Wherever the two diverge, he put money in or took money out. So "made a lot but little left" and "made little but holds a lot" are both possible and neither is strange.
⚠️ Equity is sampled weekly for anything older than a month (near-daily only recently); this line connects those points rather than measuring every day. ⚠️ It covers perps + spot + vaults + staking, not just the perps account.

Cumulative P&L
$260K
Max drawdown
$197K
Profit vs equity
88.7%
vs his peak equity of $293K
Active
384 days

Where the money comes from

86.1%13.9%$260Knetminus fees−$8,048 (3.00%)
ETH$236KSOL$189KZEC-$165KHYPE$18

Within each bar: green = directional, amber = funding.

Funding is 13.9% of gross. Fees are negative, so they are listed under the ring as a deduction rather than forced into the pie.

What kind of trader

Size76Resilience41Maker86Funding86Consistency75Spread21axes = percentile among all (further out = more pronounced, not better)
#1854top 23.5%0.15% of #1

All 6 axes are facts, not a score: percentiles among all addresses. Further out means more pronounced, not better.

How he makes it

60 bps
Net profit per $10,000 traded

His positions rarely go flat. In 384 days he fully closed out only 17 times; the rest of the time he was adjusting an open position — 4,064 fills in that span.

This is not missing data — there are no rounds to count. A win rate needs discrete trades you can score one by one, and his position never closes. So we show how much profit each dollar of volume produced instead. (Leverage inflates this number.)

Every number

Cumulative P&L (mark-to-market)$260K
Max drawdown (mark-to-market)$197K
Return (÷ true intraday peak exposure)15.9%
Profit vs his peak account equity88.7%
His peak account equity$293K
Resilience (P&L ÷ drawdown)1.32
Largest exposure held$1.64M
Open-to-flat rounds17
Spread across4 coins
Fills inside those rounds4,064
Typical round length20.0 days
Same-day in-and-out share29.4%
Taker share24.2%
Fills per day35.6
Days active384

Similar addresses

0xfce053a5e461683454bf37ad66d20344c0e3f4c0 · 0xf62edeee17968d4c55d1c74936d2110333342f30 · 0xd7a678fcf72c1b602850ef2f3e2d668ec41fa0ed · 0x9c16bc8f1104e4d2f72267eb981fa12de7cc4a6f · 0x9a0825ca6c4c577a1202a8fae3b8f044c1d5711d · 0xac26cf5f3c46b5e102048c65b977d2551b72a9c7

Where these numbers come from. Rebuilt from Hyperliquid's raw fill stream: each coin's position is cut into rounds from first entry to fully flat, then marked to the market price of every single day, plus funding, minus fees. Summing all 1.24M rounds reconciles to the daily mark-to-market P&L to 2.2e-16.

What this page is not. It describes how he made money in the past. It is not a claim that following him will make you money. We have never tested whether addresses near the top of this board do better next month — no evidence, no claim.