0xda17…5b50 · Hyperliquid address profile

0xda176ad8d69f90ea3996654915e5708aea8a5b50View on Hyperliquid ↗

Copyable nowPosition traderQuiet for 6 days Mark-to-market cumulative profit $74K, ranked #3896 site-wide.

Three things to check before following him

This address still holds
$0
This address holds nothing on Hyperliquid
Ever liquidated
Yes
5 times · $104K notional
Time since last trade
6 days
last fill 2026-09-16

Those three numbers describe where he stands now. The curve below is a different thing — how much he made in the past. An address showing $74K of profit can be sitting on an empty account, and the P&L figure alone will never tell you.

Mark-to-market cumulative P&L

$74K$77K

Three definitions on one axis: green = our mark-to-market ledger · red = the exchange's public "closed P&L" · grey dashed = exchange all-in. The shaded gap is what closed-P&L misses ($-2,644). The hatched band on the left is before our data starts (20260717); the exchange had him at $0 by then — that is why our number differs from other sites.

His account equity

Equity at start
$16K
2026-07-22
Equity now
$0
2026-09-16
All-time high
$45K
P&L over the same span
$74K
from trading, deposits excluded

The green line above is how much he made trading (rebuilt from on-chain fills; deposits and withdrawals are invisible there). This amber line is how much money is in his account (from the exchange API, deposits included). Wherever the two diverge, he put money in or took money out. So "made a lot but little left" and "made little but holds a lot" are both possible and neither is strange.
⚠️ Equity is sampled weekly for anything older than a month (near-daily only recently); this line connects those points rather than measuring every day. ⚠️ It covers perps + spot + vaults + staking, not just the perps account.

Cumulative P&L
$74K
Max drawdown
$19K
Profit vs equity
166.4%
vs his peak equity of $45K
Active
24 days

Where the money comes from

$74Knetminus fees−$1,050 (1.37%)
CASHCAT$74KSOL$2,126BTC-$1,036ETH-$957

Within each bar: green = directional, amber = funding.

Funding is -2.1% of gross. Fees are negative, so they are listed under the ring as a deduction rather than forced into the pie.

What kind of trader

Size51Resilience84Maker6Funding37Consistency56Spread21axes = percentile among all (further out = more pronounced, not better)
#3896top 49.4%0.04% of #1

All 6 axes are facts, not a score: percentiles among all addresses. Further out means more pronounced, not better.

How he makes it

Too few trades. Only 517 fills and 9 complete round trips over 24 days. Not enough to read a pattern, so win rate and efficiency are withheld.

His positions rarely go fully flat, so there is no "every round" table above — a round-trip win rate would not mean anything for him. But 1 of his positions did open and close cleanly, and those can be unfolded fill by fill:

CASHCAT

Free for 7 days when you connect a wallet.

Every number

Cumulative P&L (mark-to-market)$74K
Max drawdown (mark-to-market)$19K
Return (÷ true intraday peak exposure)47.2%
Profit vs his peak account equity166.4%
His peak account equity$45K
Resilience (P&L ÷ drawdown)3.84
Largest exposure held$157K
Open-to-flat rounds9
Spread across4 coins
Fills inside those rounds517
Typical round length6.0 days
Same-day in-and-out share66.7%
Taker share100.0%
Fills per day57.3
Days active24

Similar addresses

0xfce053a5e461683454bf37ad66d20344c0e3f4c0 · 0xf62edeee17968d4c55d1c74936d2110333342f30 · 0xd7a678fcf72c1b602850ef2f3e2d668ec41fa0ed · 0x9c16bc8f1104e4d2f72267eb981fa12de7cc4a6f · 0x9a0825ca6c4c577a1202a8fae3b8f044c1d5711d · 0xac26cf5f3c46b5e102048c65b977d2551b72a9c7

Where these numbers come from. Rebuilt from Hyperliquid's raw fill stream: each coin's position is cut into rounds from first entry to fully flat, then marked to the market price of every single day, plus funding, minus fees. Summing all 1.24M rounds reconciles to the daily mark-to-market P&L to 2.2e-16.

What this page is not. It describes how he made money in the past. It is not a claim that following him will make you money. We have never tested whether addresses near the top of this board do better next month — no evidence, no claim.