0xacc5…f0fd · Hyperliquid address profile

0xacc54e22824b6bfc184c9a5b6b12cf3471d1f0fdView on Hyperliquid ↗

⚠️ Understand firstDelta-neutral carryQuiet for 154 days Mark-to-market cumulative profit $37K, ranked #4833 site-wide.

Three things to check before following him

This address still holds
$0
This address holds nothing on Hyperliquid
Ever liquidated
No
No liquidation on record in this window
Time since last trade
154 days
last fill 2026-04-21

Those three numbers describe where he stands now. The curve below is a different thing — how much he made in the past. An address showing $37K of profit can be sitting on an empty account, and the P&L figure alone will never tell you.

Mark-to-market cumulative P&L

our ledger starts here$37K$35K

Three definitions on one axis: green = our mark-to-market ledger · red = the exchange's public "closed P&L" · grey dashed = exchange all-in. The shaded gap is what closed-P&L misses ($1,699). The hatched band on the left is before our data starts (20250728); the exchange had him at $-28 by then — that is why our number differs from other sites.

His account equity

Equity at start
$1,074
2025-07-28
Equity now
$91K
2026-04-21
All-time high
$100K
now 91% of peak
P&L over the same span
$37K
from trading, deposits excluded

The green line above is how much he made trading (rebuilt from on-chain fills; deposits and withdrawals are invisible there). This amber line is how much money is in his account (from the exchange API, deposits included). Wherever the two diverge, he put money in or took money out. So "made a lot but little left" and "made little but holds a lot" are both possible and neither is strange.
⚠️ Equity is sampled weekly for anything older than a month (near-daily only recently); this line connects those points rather than measuring every day. ⚠️ It covers perps + spot + vaults + staking, not just the perps account.

Cumulative P&L
$37K
Max drawdown
$14K
Profit vs equity
36.9%
vs his peak equity of $100K
Active
230 days

Where the money comes from

95.2%4.8%$37Knetminus fees−$145 (0.39%)
BTC$37KHYPE-$9

Within each bar: green = directional, amber = funding.

Funding is 4.8% of gross. Fees are negative, so they are listed under the ring as a deduction rather than forced into the pie.

What kind of trader

Size39Resilience70Maker47Funding71Consistency87Spread11axes = percentile among all (further out = more pronounced, not better)
#4833top 61.3%0.02% of #1

All 6 axes are facts, not a score: percentiles among all addresses. Further out means more pronounced, not better.

How he makes it

Too few trades. Only 172 fills and 3 complete round trips over 230 days. Not enough to read a pattern, so win rate and efficiency are withheld.

Understand this before following him · Delta-neutral carry
He buys spot and shorts the perp on BTC at the same time, hedge ratio 0.90 (1.0 = fully hedged). He looks like a short here, but he is not betting on direction — he earns funding. Shorting alongside him copies only one of his two legs.

Every number

Cumulative P&L (mark-to-market)$37K
Max drawdown (mark-to-market)$14K
Return (÷ true intraday peak exposure)45.9%
Profit vs his peak account equity36.9%
His peak account equity$100K
Resilience (P&L ÷ drawdown)2.66
Largest exposure held$81K
Open-to-flat rounds3
Spread across2 coins
Fills inside those rounds172
Typical round length114.5 days
Same-day in-and-out share33.3%
Taker share80.1%
Fills per day3.6
Days active230

Similar addresses

0xecb63caa47c7c4e77f60f1ce858cf28dc2b82b00 · 0x880ac484a1743862989a441d6d867238c7aa311c · 0x7fdafde5cfb5465924316eced2d3715494c517d1 · 0xd47587702a91731dc1089b5db0932cf820151a91 · 0xa312114b5795dff9b8db50474dd57701aa78ad1e · 0xb83de012dba672c76a7dbbbf3e459cb59d7d6e36

Where these numbers come from. Rebuilt from Hyperliquid's raw fill stream: each coin's position is cut into rounds from first entry to fully flat, then marked to the market price of every single day, plus funding, minus fees. Summing all 1.24M rounds reconciles to the daily mark-to-market P&L to 2.2e-16.

What this page is not. It describes how he made money in the past. It is not a claim that following him will make you money. We have never tested whether addresses near the top of this board do better next month — no evidence, no claim.