🔔 Alert me when it trades

0x77ee…a018 · Hyperliquid address profile

0x77ee3604adbdefa66a817b3cf776412a6613a018View on Hyperliquid ↗ ·

Not offered yetDelta-neutral carry Mark-to-market cumulative profit $1.14M, ranked #541 site-wide.

Three things to check before following him

This address still holds
$5.23M
perps + spot + vaults + staking; perps account $3.46M, 4 open positions
Ever liquidated
Yes
679 times · $5.30M notional
Time since last trade
Traded today
last fill 2026-10-20

Those three numbers describe where he stands now. The curve below is a different thing — how much he made in the past. An address showing $1.14M of profit can be sitting on an empty account, and the P&L figure alone will never tell you.

Mark-to-market cumulative P&L

$1.14M$287K

Three definitions on one axis: green = our mark-to-market ledger · red = the exchange's public "closed P&L" · grey dashed = exchange all-in. The shaded gap is what closed-P&L misses ($851K). The hatched band on the left is before our data starts (20260430); the exchange had him at $0 by then — that is why our number differs from other sites.

His account equity

Equity at start
$13
2026-05-06
Equity now
$5.23M
2026-10-20
All-time high
$5.93M
now 88% of peak
P&L over the same span
$1.14M
from trading, deposits excluded

The green line above is how much he made trading (rebuilt from on-chain fills; deposits and withdrawals are invisible there). This amber line is how much money is in his account (from the exchange API, deposits included). Wherever the two diverge, he put money in or took money out. So "made a lot but little left" and "made little but holds a lot" are both possible and neither is strange.
⚠️ Equity is sampled weekly for anything older than a month (near-daily only recently); this line connects those points rather than measuring every day. ⚠️ It covers perps + spot + vaults + staking, not just the perps account.

Cumulative P&L
$1.14M
Max drawdown
$3.75M
Profit vs equity
19.2%
vs his peak equity of $5.93M
Active
166 days

Where the money comes from

90.3%9.7%$1.14Mnet
BTC$1.25MZEC-$882KETH$861KXRP-$747KENA$278KPUMP$238KCASHCAT$231KAAVE$175K
minus fees−$82K (6.73%)

Funding is 9.7% of gross. Fees are negative, so they are listed under the ring as a deduction rather than forced into the pie.

Within each bar: green = directional, amber = funding. Right of the line is profit, left is loss.

What kind of trader

Size93Resilience9Maker48Funding87Consistency23Spread84
$100 – $156: 28$156 – $245: 10$245 – $383: 34$383 – $599: 45$599 – $938: 106$938 – $1,468: 242$1,468 – $2,297: 288$2,297 – $3,594: 390$3,594 – $5,623: 365$5,623 – $8,799: 375$8,799 – $14K: 376$14K – $22K: 383$22K – $34K: 365$34K – $53K: 434$53K – $83K: 806$83K – $129K: 799$129K – $202K: 659$202K – $316K: 587$316K – $495K: 471$495K – $774K: 336$774K – $1.21M: 224$1.21M – $1.90M: 156$1.90M – $2.97M: 101$2.97M – $4.64M: 87$4.64M – $7.26M: 63$7.26M – $11.36M: 52$11.36M – $17.78M: 24$17.78M – $27.83M: 12$27.83M – $43.54M: 10$43.54M – $68.13M: 3$68.13M – $106.61M: 3$106.61M – $166.81M: 4$166.81M – $261.02M: 1$100$1K$10K$100K$1M$10M$100M$1B#541 of 7,839 · top 6.9%only 540 made more · 0.46% of #1

Axes are percentiles among all addresses — further out means more pronounced, not better.

All 6 axes are facts, not a score. The right chart is cumulative profit across all 7,839 profitable addresses (log scale); the line is him — everyone to the right made more.

How he makes it

6.3
Out of every 10 positions, how many ended up green
0.75×
Average win vs average loss

One high and one low is the norm — either number alone misleads, so they are always shown as a pair.

Why copy trading is not open yet · High frequency
1,174 fills per day. Mirroring this account needs order placement at his speed and fees low enough not to eat the thin per-trade margin. That is an execution-layer problem, and we have not wired it into copy trading yet.

Also · Delta-neutral carry
He buys spot and shorts the perp on SOL at the same time, hedge ratio 0.81 (1.0 = fully hedged). He looks like a short here, but he is not betting on direction — he earns funding. Shorting alongside him copies only one of his two legs.

Every round he traded

A round is one coin, from first entry until fully flat. The curve is that round's P&L in dollars at market prices.
Coins marked ↗ open the chart zoomed to that round. Unfold shows every fill: how he scaled in and how he got out.

3 most profitable rounds

ETH Short$515K
2026-10-02 → 2026-10-08 · 7 days · 444 fills · peak $6.47M (194% of equity) · —
BTC Long$454K
2026-10-14 → 2026-10-20 · 7 days · 1,143 fills · peak $16.57M (317% of equity) · —
BTC Short$413K
2026-10-02 → 2026-10-07 · 6 days · 499 fills · peak $9.34M (280% of equity) · —

3 worst rounds

ZEC Short$-841K
2026-08-30 → 2026-09-15 · 17 days · 23,442 fills · peak $3.07M (80% of equity) · —
XRP Short$-768K
2026-08-21 → 2026-08-26 · 6 days · 9,527 fills · peak $6.93M (167% of equity) · —
SOL Short$-604K
2026-08-05 → 2026-09-15 · 42 days · 10,779 fills · peak $2.47M (59% of equity) · —

All rounds (97 rounds in total; the 30 largest by P&L are listed)

CoinSideFrom → toDaysFillsPeak % of equityP&LUnfold
SOLLong2026-10-14 → 2026-10-207933131%$274K—
BTCLong2026-10-14 → 2026-10-2071,143317%$454K—
LITLong2026-10-14 → 2026-10-20759236%$104K—
ETHLong2026-10-14 → 2026-10-207960226%$202K—
ETHShort2026-10-12 → 2026-10-13226791%$343K—
BTCShort2026-10-12 → 2026-10-132630321%$342K—
ETHShort2026-10-02 → 2026-10-087444194%$515K—
BTCShort2026-10-02 → 2026-10-076499280%$413K—
CASHCATShort2026-09-02 → 2026-10-02315,13129%$231K—
SOLLong2026-10-01 → 2026-10-022696137%$164K—
PUMPLong2026-10-01 → 2026-10-02236842%$100K—
PONSShort2026-09-02 → 2026-10-023182250%$144K—
BTCLong2026-09-29 → 2026-10-013623375%$267K—
BTCShort2026-09-18 → 2026-09-2141,954417%$-494K—
ZECShort2026-08-30 → 2026-09-151723,44280%$-841K—
SOLShort2026-08-05 → 2026-09-154210,77959%$-604K—
ETHShort2026-08-19 → 2026-09-15289,559169%$-292K—
PUMPShort2026-08-21 → 2026-09-051621524%$139K—
XRPShort2026-08-21 → 2026-08-2669,527167%$-768K—
XMRShort2026-08-05 → 2026-08-26221,7379%$-57K—
AAVELong2026-08-22 → 2026-08-23281733%$170K—
BTCLong2026-08-13 → 2026-08-17550891%$108K—
BTCShort2026-08-04 → 2026-08-12961785%$62K—
XPLLong2026-06-19 → 2026-08-06495,482138%$-77K—
WLDLong2026-06-10 → 2026-08-05575,37285%$-158K—
HYPELong2026-06-19 → 2026-08-05485,07280%$-56K—
NEARLong2026-06-10 → 2026-08-04565,05937%$-68K—
ETHLong2026-06-19 → 2026-07-26381599%$76K—
xyz:SPCXLong2026-07-09 → 2026-07-2214610122%$-164K—
BTCLong2026-06-19 → 2026-07-2133239197%$107K—

Two rounds can both say "made $1M" and be nothing alike: one held steady the whole way, another sat 50% underwater before recovering, a third earned everything on the final day. The number hides that; the curve shows it. Curves are drawn only for rounds held 5 days or longer — shorter ones have too few points to be honest. This is what already happened, not a forecast.

Every number

Cumulative P&L (mark-to-market)$1.14M
Max drawdown (mark-to-market)$3.75M
Return (÷ true intraday peak exposure)2.7%
Profit vs his peak account equity19.2%
His peak account equity$5.93M
Resilience (P&L ÷ drawdown)0.30
Largest exposure held$42.30M
Open-to-flat rounds114
Spread across43 coins
Fills inside those rounds140,885
Typical round length6.0 days
Same-day in-and-out share14.9%
Taker share77.7%
Fills per day1,174.0
Days active166

Similar addresses

0xb83de012dba672c76a7dbbbf3e459cb59d7d6e36 · 0xecb63caa47c7c4e77f60f1ce858cf28dc2b82b00 · 0x880ac484a1743862989a441d6d867238c7aa311c · 0x7fdafde5cfb5465924316eced2d3715494c517d1 · 0xd47587702a91731dc1089b5db0932cf820151a91 · 0xa312114b5795dff9b8db50474dd57701aa78ad1e

Where these numbers come from. Rebuilt from Hyperliquid's raw fill stream: each coin's position is cut into rounds from first entry to fully flat, then marked to the market price of every single day, plus funding, minus fees. Summing all 1.24M rounds reconciles to the daily mark-to-market P&L to 2.2e-16.

What this page is not. It describes how he made money in the past. It is not a claim that following him will make you money. We have never tested whether addresses near the top of this board do better next month — no evidence, no claim.