This address still holds
$34K
perps + spot + vaults + staking; perps account $0, no open positions
0x7759d4dca0b4467314ba08d22dfdb6dac9c22a8bView on Hyperliquid ↗
Not offered yetIntraday Mark-to-market cumulative profit $142K, ranked #2740 site-wide.
Those three numbers describe where he stands now. The curve below is a different thing — how much he made in the past. An address showing $142K of profit can be sitting on an empty account, and the P&L figure alone will never tell you.
Three definitions on one axis: green = our mark-to-market ledger · red = the exchange's public "closed P&L" · grey dashed = exchange all-in. The shaded gap is what closed-P&L misses ($-27K). The hatched band on the left is before our data starts (20251003); the exchange had him at $0 by then — that is why our number differs from other sites.
The green line above is how much he made trading (rebuilt from on-chain fills; deposits and withdrawals are invisible there). This amber line is how much money is in his account (from the exchange API, deposits included). Wherever the two diverge, he put money in or took money out. So "made a lot but little left" and "made little but holds a lot" are both possible and neither is strange.
⚠️ Equity is sampled weekly for anything older than a month (near-daily only recently); this line connects those points rather than measuring every day. ⚠️ It covers perps + spot + vaults + staking, not just the perps account.
Within each bar: green = directional, amber = funding.
Funding is 0.0% of gross. Fees are negative, so they are listed under the ring as a deduction rather than forced into the pie.
All 6 axes are facts, not a score: percentiles among all addresses. Further out means more pronounced, not better.
One high and one low is the norm — either number alone misleads, so they are always shown as a pair.
Why copy trading is not open yet · Intraday
100.0% of his positions open and close the same day. By the time our polling picks one up it has often already been closed. Following this tier needs tighter position polling, and that tier is not open yet.
| Cumulative P&L (mark-to-market) | $142K |
| Max drawdown (mark-to-market) | $13K |
| Return (÷ true intraday peak exposure) | 15.8% |
| Profit vs his peak account equity | 242.2% |
| His peak account equity | $59K |
| Resilience (P&L ÷ drawdown) | 10.59 |
| Largest exposure held | $898K |
| Open-to-flat rounds | 412 |
| Spread across | 151 coins |
| Fills inside those rounds | 19,188 |
| Typical round length | — |
| Same-day in-and-out share | 100.0% |
| Taker share | 30.8% |
| Fills per day | 88.0 |
| Days active | 218 |
0x412837cc7bc11d78197ace6b4c27f86a121f3c48 · 0xedab6e3998ffddcb354094ffe8ca2a3cff8d3370 · 0x7af7a67918b49dd5933c56b0c4a5fb73499bffec · 0x3f1c0f2130158c4ff45acd214fd81b37441a9ab5 · 0xa33e1ba6e16f18a50c78d36eb423f24b6417cd71 · 0x4e994d450c7c710ba4baeda5e249acc71f80aa1b
Where these numbers come from. Rebuilt from Hyperliquid's raw fill stream: each coin's position is cut into rounds from first entry to fully flat, then marked to the market price of every single day, plus funding, minus fees. Summing all 1.24M rounds reconciles to the daily mark-to-market P&L to 2.2e-16.
What this page is not. It describes how he made money in the past. It is not a claim that following him will make you money. We have never tested whether addresses near the top of this board do better next month — no evidence, no claim.