This address still holds
$12
perps + spot + vaults + staking; perps account $0, no open positions
0x6890f5d900fc26c7563e5032f25bb180bcae2d4aView on Hyperliquid ↗ ·
Copyable nowPosition traderQuiet for 231 days Mark-to-market cumulative profit $59K, ranked #4312 site-wide.
Those three numbers describe where he stands now. The curve below is a different thing — how much he made in the past. An address showing $59K of profit can be sitting on an empty account, and the P&L figure alone will never tell you.
Three definitions on one axis: green = our mark-to-market ledger · red = the exchange's public "closed P&L" · grey dashed = exchange all-in. The shaded gap is what closed-P&L misses ($-1,775). The hatched band on the left is before our data starts (20260209); the exchange had him at $0 by then — that is why our number differs from other sites.
The green line above is how much he made trading (rebuilt from on-chain fills; deposits and withdrawals are invisible there). This amber line is how much money is in his account (from the exchange API, deposits included). Wherever the two diverge, he put money in or took money out. So "made a lot but little left" and "made little but holds a lot" are both possible and neither is strange.
⚠️ Equity is sampled weekly for anything older than a month (near-daily only recently); this line connects those points rather than measuring every day. ⚠️ It covers perps + spot + vaults + staking, not just the perps account.
Funding is 0.1% of gross. Fees are negative, so they are listed under the ring as a deduction rather than forced into the pie.
Within each bar: green = directional, amber = funding. Right of the line is profit, left is loss.
Axes are percentiles among all addresses — further out means more pronounced, not better.
All 6 axes are facts, not a score. The right chart is cumulative profit across all 7,895 profitable addresses (log scale); the line is him — everyone to the right made more.
Too few trades. Only 485 fills and 5 complete round trips over 10 days. Not enough to read a pattern, so win rate and efficiency are withheld.
| Cumulative P&L (mark-to-market) | $59K |
| Max drawdown (mark-to-market) | $12K |
| Return (÷ true intraday peak exposure) | 5.3% |
| Profit vs his peak account equity | 59.6% |
| His peak account equity | $99K |
| Resilience (P&L ÷ drawdown) | 4.73 |
| Largest exposure held | $1.10M |
| Open-to-flat rounds | 5 |
| Spread across | 4 coins |
| Fills inside those rounds | 485 |
| Typical round length | 4.0 days |
| Same-day in-and-out share | 60.0% |
| Taker share | 55.1% |
| Fills per day | 53.9 |
| Days active | 10 |
0xfce053a5e461683454bf37ad66d20344c0e3f4c0 · 0xf62edeee17968d4c55d1c74936d2110333342f30 · 0x9c16bc8f1104e4d2f72267eb981fa12de7cc4a6f · 0xd7a678fcf72c1b602850ef2f3e2d668ec41fa0ed · 0x9a0825ca6c4c577a1202a8fae3b8f044c1d5711d · 0x7de07bb8a43c1953a019906cf2c8287dae478be9
Where these numbers come from. Rebuilt from Hyperliquid's raw fill stream: each coin's position is cut into rounds from first entry to fully flat, then marked to the market price of every single day, plus funding, minus fees. Summing all 1.24M rounds reconciles to the daily mark-to-market P&L to 2.2e-16.
What this page is not. It describes how he made money in the past. It is not a claim that following him will make you money. We have never tested whether addresses near the top of this board do better next month — no evidence, no claim.