This address still holds
Unknown
We could not read it this run — that is not the same as zero
0x66f53c70727a47b1adccb84fcd653d76461edfe6View on Hyperliquid ↗ ·
Not offered yetDelta-neutral carry Mark-to-market cumulative profit $4.03M (perps + spot, since 2026-05-19), ranked #217 site-wide.
Those three numbers describe where he stands now. The curve below is a different thing — how much he made in the past. An address showing $4.03M of profit can be sitting on an empty account, and the P&L figure alone will never tell you.
Cumulative P&L at market prices (open positions included, plus funding, minus fees) — not the exchange's "closed P&L", which only counts positions someone chose to close. 20260519 – 20261022, 157 trading days.
Funding is 6.1% of gross. Fees are negative, so they are listed under the ring as a deduction rather than forced into the pie.
Within each bar: green = directional, amber = funding. Right of the line is profit, left is loss. Italic names are spot.
Axes are percentiles among all addresses — further out means more pronounced, not better.
All 6 axes are facts, not a score. The right chart is cumulative profit across all 7,590 profitable addresses (log scale); the line is him — everyone to the right made more.
His positions rarely go flat. In 157 days he fully closed out only 1 times; the rest of the time he was adjusting an open position — 27,860 fills in that span.
This is not missing data — there are no rounds to count. A win rate needs discrete trades you can score one by one, and his position never closes. So we show how much profit each dollar of volume produced instead. (Leverage inflates this number.)
Why copy trading is not open yet · High frequency
300 fills per day. Mirroring this account needs order placement at his speed and fees low enough not to eat the thin per-trade margin. That is an execution-layer problem, and we have not wired it into copy trading yet.
Also · Delta-neutral carry
He buys spot and shorts the perp on HYPE at the same time, hedge ratio 1.00 (1.0 = fully hedged). He looks like a short here, but he is not betting on direction — he earns funding. Shorting alongside him copies only one of his two legs.
| Cumulative P&L (mark-to-market) | $4.03M |
| Max drawdown (mark-to-market) | $904K |
| Return (÷ true intraday peak exposure) | 55.7% |
| Profit vs his peak account equity | — |
| His peak account equity | — |
| Resilience (P&L ÷ drawdown) | 4.46 |
| Largest exposure held | $7.24M |
| Open-to-flat rounds | 1 |
| Spread across | 1 coins |
| Fills inside those rounds | 27,860 |
| Typical round length | 157.0 days |
| Same-day in-and-out share | 0.0% |
| Taker share | 100.0% |
| Fills per day | 299.6 |
| Days active | 157 |
0xb83de012dba672c76a7dbbbf3e459cb59d7d6e36 · 0xecb63caa47c7c4e77f60f1ce858cf28dc2b82b00 · 0x7fdafde5cfb5465924316eced2d3715494c517d1 · 0x880ac484a1743862989a441d6d867238c7aa311c · 0xa312114b5795dff9b8db50474dd57701aa78ad1e · 0xd47587702a91731dc1089b5db0932cf820151a91
Where these numbers come from. Rebuilt from Hyperliquid's raw fill stream: each coin's position is cut into rounds from first entry to fully flat, then marked to the market price of every single day, plus funding, minus fees. Summing all 1.24M rounds reconciles to the daily mark-to-market P&L to 2.2e-16.
What this page is not. It describes how he made money in the past. It is not a claim that following him will make you money. We have never tested whether addresses near the top of this board do better next month — no evidence, no claim.