This address still holds
$0
This address holds nothing on Hyperliquid
0x44ea6f4805b92b14951c109fed1ef55d6fa6d084View on Hyperliquid ↗ ·
CopyPosition trader Mark-to-market cumulative profit $100K (perps + spot, since 2025-10-08), ranked #3171 site-wide. All-time P&L on the exchange's own record (incl. spot, vaults, staking): $81K.
Those three numbers describe where he stands now. The curve below is a different thing — how much he made in the past. An address showing $100K of profit can be sitting on an empty account, and the P&L figure alone will never tell you.
Three definitions on one axis: green = our mark-to-market ledger (perps + spot) · red = the exchange's public "closed P&L" · grey dashed = exchange all-in (also includes vaults and staking). The shaded gap is what closed-P&L misses ($-2,029). The hatched band on the left is before our data starts (20251008); the exchange had him at $-19K by then — that is why our number differs from other sites.
The green line above is how much he made trading (rebuilt from on-chain fills; deposits and withdrawals are invisible there). This amber line is how much money is in his account (from the exchange API, deposits included). Wherever the two diverge, he put money in or took money out. So "made a lot but little left" and "made little but holds a lot" are both possible and neither is strange. Account equity covers perps, spot, vaults and staking.
Funding is -1.2% of gross. Fees are negative, so they are listed under the ring as a deduction rather than forced into the pie.
Within each bar: green = directional, amber = funding. Right of the line is profit, left is loss. Italic names are spot.
Axes are percentiles among all addresses — further out means more pronounced, not better.
All 6 axes are facts, not a score. The right chart is cumulative profit across all 7,432 profitable addresses (log scale); the line is him — everyone to the right made more.
Too few trades. Only 459 fills and 13 complete round trips over 177 days. Not enough to read a pattern, so win rate and efficiency are withheld.
His positions rarely go fully flat, so there is no "every round" table above — a round-trip win rate would not mean anything for him. But 1 of his positions did open and close cleanly, and those can be unfolded fill by fill:
| Cumulative P&L (mark-to-market) | $100K |
| Max drawdown (mark-to-market) | $26K |
| Return (÷ true intraday peak exposure) | 79.3% |
| Profit vs his peak account equity | 194.6% |
| His peak account equity | $51K |
| Resilience (P&L ÷ drawdown) | 3.90 |
| Largest exposure held | $126K |
| Open-to-flat rounds | 13 |
| Spread across | 6 coins |
| Fills inside those rounds | 459 |
| Typical round length | 3.0 days |
| Same-day in-and-out share | 15.4% |
| Taker share | 99.1% |
| Fills per day | 17.6 |
| Days active | 177 |
0xfce053a5e461683454bf37ad66d20344c0e3f4c0 · 0x9c16bc8f1104e4d2f72267eb981fa12de7cc4a6f · 0xf62edeee17968d4c55d1c74936d2110333342f30 · 0xd7a678fcf72c1b602850ef2f3e2d668ec41fa0ed · 0xac26cf5f3c46b5e102048c65b977d2551b72a9c7 · 0x7de07bb8a43c1953a019906cf2c8287dae478be9
Where these numbers come from. Rebuilt from Hyperliquid's raw fill stream: each coin's position is cut into rounds from first entry to fully flat, then marked to the market price of every single day, plus funding, minus fees. Summing all 1.24M rounds reconciles to the daily mark-to-market P&L to 2.2e-16.