This address still holds
$0
This address holds nothing on Hyperliquid
0x3d4510e14071d88c7ab87205468392af3a01e41aView on Hyperliquid ↗
Not offered yetHigh frequencyQuiet for 86 days Mark-to-market cumulative profit $43K, ranked #4696 site-wide.
Those three numbers describe where he stands now. The curve below is a different thing — how much he made in the past. An address showing $43K of profit can be sitting on an empty account, and the P&L figure alone will never tell you.
Three definitions on one axis: green = our mark-to-market ledger · red = the exchange's public "closed P&L" · grey dashed = exchange all-in. The shaded gap is what closed-P&L misses ($-1,069). The hatched band on the left is before our data starts (20260605); the exchange had him at $0 by then — that is why our number differs from other sites.
The green line above is how much he made trading (rebuilt from on-chain fills; deposits and withdrawals are invisible there). This amber line is how much money is in his account (from the exchange API, deposits included). Wherever the two diverge, he put money in or took money out. So "made a lot but little left" and "made little but holds a lot" are both possible and neither is strange.
⚠️ Equity is sampled weekly for anything older than a month (near-daily only recently); this line connects those points rather than measuring every day. ⚠️ It covers perps + spot + vaults + staking, not just the perps account.
Within each bar: green = directional, amber = funding.
Funding is -2.3% of gross. Fees are negative, so they are listed under the ring as a deduction rather than forced into the pie.
All 6 axes are facts, not a score: percentiles among all addresses. Further out means more pronounced, not better.
Too few trades. Only 869 fills and 1 complete round trips over 24 days. Not enough to read a pattern, so win rate and efficiency are withheld.
Why copy trading is not open yet · High frequency
174 fills per day. Mirroring this account needs order placement at his speed and fees low enough not to eat the thin per-trade margin. That is an execution-layer problem, and we have not wired it into copy trading yet.
| Cumulative P&L (mark-to-market) | $43K |
| Max drawdown (mark-to-market) | $6,943 |
| Return (÷ true intraday peak exposure) | 61.4% |
| Profit vs his peak account equity | 40.7% |
| His peak account equity | $105K |
| Resilience (P&L ÷ drawdown) | 6.14 |
| Largest exposure held | $69K |
| Open-to-flat rounds | 1 |
| Spread across | 1 coins |
| Fills inside those rounds | 869 |
| Typical round length | 24.0 days |
| Same-day in-and-out share | 0.0% |
| Taker share | 95.5% |
| Fills per day | 173.8 |
| Days active | 24 |
0x5b5d51203a0f9079f8aeb098a6523a13f298c060 · 0x2ea18c23f72a4b6172c55b411823cdc5335923f4 · 0x35d1151ef1aab579cbb3109e69fa82f94ff5acb1 · 0xa5b0edf6b55128e0ddae8e51ac538c3188401d41 · 0x418aa6bf98a2b2bc93779f810330d88cde488888 · 0x15a4f009bb324a3fb9e36137136b201e3fe0dfdb
Where these numbers come from. Rebuilt from Hyperliquid's raw fill stream: each coin's position is cut into rounds from first entry to fully flat, then marked to the market price of every single day, plus funding, minus fees. Summing all 1.24M rounds reconciles to the daily mark-to-market P&L to 2.2e-16.
What this page is not. It describes how he made money in the past. It is not a claim that following him will make you money. We have never tested whether addresses near the top of this board do better next month — no evidence, no claim.