0x2639…7236 · Hyperliquid address profile

0x26393bcb4446d3f40bdc15ca59d7febcb09e7236View on Hyperliquid ↗

Copyable nowPosition traderQuiet for 235 days Mark-to-market cumulative profit $113K, ranked #3126 site-wide.

Three things to check before following him

This address still holds
$0
This address holds nothing on Hyperliquid
Ever liquidated
No
No liquidation on record in this window
Time since last trade
235 days
last fill 2026-01-30

Those three numbers describe where he stands now. The curve below is a different thing — how much he made in the past. An address showing $113K of profit can be sitting on an empty account, and the P&L figure alone will never tell you.

Mark-to-market cumulative P&L

$113K$115K

Three definitions on one axis: green = our mark-to-market ledger · red = the exchange's public "closed P&L" · grey dashed = exchange all-in. The shaded gap is what closed-P&L misses ($-2,503). The hatched band on the left is before our data starts (20250826); the exchange had him at $0 by then — that is why our number differs from other sites.

His account equity

Equity at start
$115K
2025-08-27
Equity now
$0
2026-01-30
All-time high
$115K
P&L over the same span
$113K
from trading, deposits excluded

The green line above is how much he made trading (rebuilt from on-chain fills; deposits and withdrawals are invisible there). This amber line is how much money is in his account (from the exchange API, deposits included). Wherever the two diverge, he put money in or took money out. So "made a lot but little left" and "made little but holds a lot" are both possible and neither is strange.
⚠️ Equity is sampled weekly for anything older than a month (near-daily only recently); this line connects those points rather than measuring every day. ⚠️ It covers perps + spot + vaults + staking, not just the perps account.

Cumulative P&L
$113K
Max drawdown
$50K
Profit vs equity
97.8%
vs his peak equity of $115K
Active
136 days

Where the money comes from

$113Knetminus fees−$325 (0.28%)
ENA$96KMON$12KRESOLV$5,638WLFI$2,729XPL-$2,088xyz:SILVE-$1,828POPCAT$247kBONK$191

Within each bar: green = directional, amber = funding.

Funding is -1.9% of gross. Fees are negative, so they are listed under the ring as a deduction rather than forced into the pie.

What kind of trader

Size60Resilience63Maker58Funding38Consistency82Spread47axes = percentile among all (further out = more pronounced, not better)
#3126top 39.7%0.07% of #1

All 6 axes are facts, not a score: percentiles among all addresses. Further out means more pronounced, not better.

How he makes it

854 bps
Net profit per $10,000 traded

His positions rarely go flat. In 136 days he fully closed out only 14 times; the rest of the time he was adjusting an open position — 1,379 fills in that span.

This is not missing data — there are no rounds to count. A win rate needs discrete trades you can score one by one, and his position never closes. So we show how much profit each dollar of volume produced instead. (Leverage inflates this number.)

Every number

Cumulative P&L (mark-to-market)$113K
Max drawdown (mark-to-market)$50K
Return (÷ true intraday peak exposure)49.3%
Profit vs his peak account equity97.8%
His peak account equity$115K
Resilience (P&L ÷ drawdown)2.26
Largest exposure held$229K
Open-to-flat rounds14
Spread across12 coins
Fills inside those rounds1,379
Typical round length3.0 days
Same-day in-and-out share64.3%
Taker share65.3%
Fills per day37.2
Days active136

Similar addresses

0xfce053a5e461683454bf37ad66d20344c0e3f4c0 · 0xf62edeee17968d4c55d1c74936d2110333342f30 · 0xd7a678fcf72c1b602850ef2f3e2d668ec41fa0ed · 0x9c16bc8f1104e4d2f72267eb981fa12de7cc4a6f · 0x9a0825ca6c4c577a1202a8fae3b8f044c1d5711d · 0xac26cf5f3c46b5e102048c65b977d2551b72a9c7

Where these numbers come from. Rebuilt from Hyperliquid's raw fill stream: each coin's position is cut into rounds from first entry to fully flat, then marked to the market price of every single day, plus funding, minus fees. Summing all 1.24M rounds reconciles to the daily mark-to-market P&L to 2.2e-16.

What this page is not. It describes how he made money in the past. It is not a claim that following him will make you money. We have never tested whether addresses near the top of this board do better next month — no evidence, no claim.