This address still holds
$0
This address holds nothing on Hyperliquid
0x12ff2ae4a6de76697fd175667dfa2e066d9f5e10View on Hyperliquid ↗
Copyable nowPosition trader Mark-to-market cumulative profit $31K, ranked #4965 site-wide.
Those three numbers describe where he stands now. The curve below is a different thing — how much he made in the past. An address showing $31K of profit can be sitting on an empty account, and the P&L figure alone will never tell you.
Three definitions on one axis: green = our mark-to-market ledger · red = the exchange's public "closed P&L" · grey dashed = exchange all-in. The shaded gap is what closed-P&L misses ($1,850). The hatched band on the left is before our data starts (20250727); the exchange had him at $-13K by then — that is why our number differs from other sites.
The green line above is how much he made trading (rebuilt from on-chain fills; deposits and withdrawals are invisible there). This amber line is how much money is in his account (from the exchange API, deposits included). Wherever the two diverge, he put money in or took money out. So "made a lot but little left" and "made little but holds a lot" are both possible and neither is strange.
⚠️ Equity is sampled weekly for anything older than a month (near-daily only recently); this line connects those points rather than measuring every day. ⚠️ It covers perps + spot + vaults + staking, not just the perps account.
Within each bar: green = directional, amber = funding.
Funding is 7.6% of gross. Fees are negative, so they are listed under the ring as a deduction rather than forced into the pie.
All 6 axes are facts, not a score: percentiles among all addresses. Further out means more pronounced, not better.
His positions rarely go flat. In 423 days he fully closed out only 17 times; the rest of the time he was adjusting an open position — 4,550 fills in that span.
This is not missing data — there are no rounds to count. A win rate needs discrete trades you can score one by one, and his position never closes. So we show how much profit each dollar of volume produced instead. (Leverage inflates this number.)
| Cumulative P&L (mark-to-market) | $31K |
| Max drawdown (mark-to-market) | $14K |
| Return (÷ true intraday peak exposure) | 51.1% |
| Profit vs his peak account equity | 69.0% |
| His peak account equity | $46K |
| Resilience (P&L ÷ drawdown) | 2.29 |
| Largest exposure held | $62K |
| Open-to-flat rounds | 17 |
| Spread across | 7 coins |
| Fills inside those rounds | 4,550 |
| Typical round length | 21.0 days |
| Same-day in-and-out share | 0.0% |
| Taker share | 99.7% |
| Fills per day | 37.3 |
| Days active | 423 |
0xfce053a5e461683454bf37ad66d20344c0e3f4c0 · 0xf62edeee17968d4c55d1c74936d2110333342f30 · 0xd7a678fcf72c1b602850ef2f3e2d668ec41fa0ed · 0x9c16bc8f1104e4d2f72267eb981fa12de7cc4a6f · 0x9a0825ca6c4c577a1202a8fae3b8f044c1d5711d · 0xac26cf5f3c46b5e102048c65b977d2551b72a9c7
Where these numbers come from. Rebuilt from Hyperliquid's raw fill stream: each coin's position is cut into rounds from first entry to fully flat, then marked to the market price of every single day, plus funding, minus fees. Summing all 1.24M rounds reconciles to the daily mark-to-market P&L to 2.2e-16.
What this page is not. It describes how he made money in the past. It is not a claim that following him will make you money. We have never tested whether addresses near the top of this board do better next month — no evidence, no claim.