0x12ff…d65f · Hyperliquid address profile

0x12ff188ff6ee8133af10b0a61e241a3c0709d65fView on Hyperliquid ↗

Copyable nowPosition trader Mark-to-market cumulative profit $51K, ranked #4530 site-wide.

Three things to check before following him

This address still holds
$219K
perps + spot + vaults + staking; perps account $2,977, 1 open positions
Ever liquidated
No
No liquidation on record in this window
Time since last trade
Traded today
last fill 2026-09-22

Those three numbers describe where he stands now. The curve below is a different thing — how much he made in the past. An address showing $51K of profit can be sitting on an empty account, and the P&L figure alone will never tell you.

Mark-to-market cumulative P&L

our ledger starts here$59K$50K

Three definitions on one axis: green = our mark-to-market ledger · red = the exchange's public "closed P&L" · grey dashed = exchange all-in. The shaded gap is what closed-P&L misses ($8,758). The hatched band on the left is before our data starts (20250728); the exchange had him at $8,248 by then — that is why our number differs from other sites.

His account equity

Equity at start
$0
2025-07-28
Equity now
$218K
2026-09-22
All-time high
$219K
now 100% of peak
P&L over the same span
$51K
from trading, deposits excluded

The green line above is how much he made trading (rebuilt from on-chain fills; deposits and withdrawals are invisible there). This amber line is how much money is in his account (from the exchange API, deposits included). Wherever the two diverge, he put money in or took money out. So "made a lot but little left" and "made little but holds a lot" are both possible and neither is strange.
⚠️ Equity is sampled weekly for anything older than a month (near-daily only recently); this line connects those points rather than measuring every day. ⚠️ It covers perps + spot + vaults + staking, not just the perps account.

Cumulative P&L
$51K
Max drawdown
$83K
Profit vs equity
23.2%
vs his peak equity of $219K
Active
381 days

Where the money comes from

87.8%12.2%$51Knetminus fees−$1,647 (3.15%)
SOL$51K

Within each bar: green = directional, amber = funding.

Funding is 12.2% of gross. Fees are negative, so they are listed under the ring as a deduction rather than forced into the pie.

What kind of trader

Size43Resilience18Maker85Funding84Consistency73Spread4axes = percentile among all (further out = more pronounced, not better)
#4530top 57.5%0.03% of #1

All 6 axes are facts, not a score: percentiles among all addresses. Further out means more pronounced, not better.

How he makes it

73 bps
Net profit per $10,000 traded

His positions rarely go flat. In 381 days he fully closed out only 19 times; the rest of the time he was adjusting an open position — 2,140 fills in that span.

This is not missing data — there are no rounds to count. A win rate needs discrete trades you can score one by one, and his position never closes. So we show how much profit each dollar of volume produced instead. (Leverage inflates this number.)

Every number

Cumulative P&L (mark-to-market)$51K
Max drawdown (mark-to-market)$83K
Return (÷ true intraday peak exposure)23.6%
Profit vs his peak account equity23.2%
His peak account equity$219K
Resilience (P&L ÷ drawdown)0.61
Largest exposure held$214K
Open-to-flat rounds19
Spread across1 coins
Fills inside those rounds2,140
Typical round length10.5 days
Same-day in-and-out share57.9%
Taker share26.1%
Fills per day17.8
Days active381

Similar addresses

0xfce053a5e461683454bf37ad66d20344c0e3f4c0 · 0xf62edeee17968d4c55d1c74936d2110333342f30 · 0xd7a678fcf72c1b602850ef2f3e2d668ec41fa0ed · 0x9c16bc8f1104e4d2f72267eb981fa12de7cc4a6f · 0x9a0825ca6c4c577a1202a8fae3b8f044c1d5711d · 0xac26cf5f3c46b5e102048c65b977d2551b72a9c7

Where these numbers come from. Rebuilt from Hyperliquid's raw fill stream: each coin's position is cut into rounds from first entry to fully flat, then marked to the market price of every single day, plus funding, minus fees. Summing all 1.24M rounds reconciles to the daily mark-to-market P&L to 2.2e-16.

What this page is not. It describes how he made money in the past. It is not a claim that following him will make you money. We have never tested whether addresses near the top of this board do better next month — no evidence, no claim.